Plastics are one of the most destructive pollutants affecting creatures and eco-systems in all areas of the planet.
Here could be some links to sites or information about plastics.
The 3R’s are overused and misunderstood. I think people for the most part forget the first 2 R’s and concentrate on the last one: Recycling. But what is needed is a different mindset on waste. So I came up with the 4 P’s instead of the 3 R’s. What are the 4 P’s? Pause, Protect, Promote & be Proactive.
Pause: What is the material? Do I need it?
Protect: Take care of your personal health; your community; the health of the environment.
Promote: Be a voice for healthy alternatives for you and your community.
Proactive: Set up zero waste or waste minimization programs at your school, home, office. “Start from where you are, work from your field of influence.” Write to companies about the packaging of their products. Seek out of create alternatives.
Here’s an interview I did with Prana Nutrition Cures on plastics and the effects of exposure on human health. The characteristics that define plastic – it’s cheap, its durable, it’s flexible, it’s lightweight – have led to plastic’s prevalence around the globe. But it’s durability is the same reason why it is so environmentally damaging: it doesn’t go away. Additionally, plastics are made with a whole concoction of chemicals, and the ramifications of surrounding ourselves with petrochemicals are now becoming more clear. Specific plastics to be wary of include numbers three, six and seven. Watch full video here
The US Toxic Substance Control Act was created in 1976, and at this time the 62,000 chemicals already in use were ‘grandfathered’ into the system. Since 1976, 20,000 new chemicals have been introduced into our production cycles – into our ecosystems and into households – and only 200 of these chemicals have gone through intense review, and of these only 5 have been banned. Only 5 out of over 80,000. And regulations don’t even begin to get into the compounding effects of multiple chemical exposure, and in modern society we are bombarded by a chemical cocktail everyday. For instance, even if we want to know what chemical additive substances are in plastics, oftentimes this mix is a highly guarded company secret. Tragically, the accumulation of plastics of all size will be a source of undeterminable global contamination to deal with in the future ~ We need a precautionary principle when dealing with chemicals to limit exposure for all sentient beings, after all humans are not the only ones effected ~
Recycling is a misunderstood word. People often associate it as a positive action, with beneficial results for society. However, race-to-the bottom globalization of the waste trade has resulted in a situation where recycling is often not a service actually provided by global north countries, but something outsourced to the global south. Countries ship their waste 1000s of miles to be processed with no accountability or transparency as to ‘what these recycling processes’ consist of. Oftentimes, these processes are little more than backyard and/or informal operations in places with nonexistent environmental and labor law enforcement, that damage both the environment and the health of the workers (especially when processing plastics and e-waste, as workers really have no awareness of the chemical dangers of these materials). In this case in Indonesia, containers are marked as ‘recycling’ but really contain mixed waste. This intentionally-deceptive trade is happening more and more frequently now that China has stopped taking the world’s waste/recycling. Global north countries can afford to send the containers, and there is always someone in lax governance countries to take the bribe. In Sri Lanka, recently even hospital waste was found hidden within ‘recycling’ waste containers. I think that for materials to be truly ‘recyclable’ there needs to be means to process the materials within a 100mi radius, for instance, to make the processes accountable, to keep resources circulating within a bioregion, to minimize carbon footprints of transport, and to facilitate the materials awareness needed to minimize and eliminate toxic waste streams and replace with regenerative and nontoxic materials. There is no away, and acknowledging this opens up a window of opportunity to transform a broken system with creative, local responses for resource/materials accountability.
Follow more of Stiv’s work here at The Story of Plastic: https://www.storyofplastic.org/
As long as there is increased production of plastics, we will have increasing and accumulating plastic pollution across the globe, in urban and remote areas as these microplastics cannot be contained. Most companies are still designed around this endless growth model (increased sales and distribution of plastic products), thinking making products that ‘could’ be recycled will be ok. But, first off we don’t even have the infrastructure for this and even if we did, we cannot recycle our way out of this mess.
Article is on the TRILLIONS of plastic pieces that flow into San Francisco Bay every year. And SF is a place that cares about reducing plastics, that has made several bans against certain kinds of plastics. Think about the global damage.
Reduce your use/exposure to chemicals and packaging. At least there is one country that is taking the link between chemicals in products and health seriously!! PFAS exposure includes: liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased fertility, high cholesterol, obesity, hormone suppression and cancer. Men especially should be concerned with trends in endocrine disruptors and male fertility **Read up on this topic, it’s not something to take lightly!
Instead of seeing the problem of too much waste and asking a logical question like: ‘why don’t we make less of it? What tap should we turn off?’ More and more these sorts of deceptive/distractive ‘solutions’ are popping up. The last thing we need is more chemicals on the planet; and burning of plastics without creating upstream cultural and political changes just means more and more plastics will continue to be produced. It’s a vicious cycle and ultimately we all end up losing.
We are not immune to the repercussions of our actions. How personal does the problem need to become in order to act on it? When something happens to ‘the environment out there’ is it easier to turn a blind eye? Why do we draw a line to delineate the self and other? Maybe it seems safer that way, but ultimately it just perpetuates limited awareness. How can we start seeing and feeling that we’re all connected and everything we do to the soil, the air, the water, the plants, the animals, we do to ourselves.
*note: all these studies are ongoing due to the nature of increased plastics and chemical use within the past several decades. As time goes on, and longitudinal studies are published, I am sure we will be made aware of much greater damage. This is why operating with the ‘precautionary principle’ to limit chemical exposure is better than ‘innocent until proven guilty’ policy. By the time there is sufficient proof of harm of chemicals, the problem is already widespread with decades of exposure.